There’s good news and bad news in today’s economic reports. In the labor market, Initial jobless claims dropped a hefty 26,000 last week—the biggest weekly decline since July—to a seasonally adjusted 359,000. That leaves new filings for unemployment benefits close to the post-recession low of 352,000 from the week ending July 7. But this encouraging news is marred by a steep drop in durable goods order for August. Does one data set trump the other? That’s to be determined in the weeks ahead as more numbers roll in. Meantime, there are two newly minted data points to consider, each one contradicting the other in rather stark terms. The macro truth will out, and probably quite soon. Meantime, today's menu of statistics offer a choice: darkness or light.
Actually, one could reasonably argue that nothing much has changed for the trend in jobless claims, last week’s data point notwithstanding. As I regularly advise, the clearer analysis of jobless claims—an unusually noisy data set—typically arises from looking at year-over-year changes before seasonal adjustment. By that standard, the news is relatively upbeat, as it has been for most of the past 12 months, namely: claims continue to fall by roughly 10% a year. If and when the annual pace starts rising on a consistent basis vs. year-ago levels, we’ll have a dark signal to consider for the business cycle. At the moment, however, we’re nowhere near that turning point, which is to say that the labor market continues to heal, albeit slowly.
But all this happy talk is tarnished with the news that new orders for durable goods dropped 13.2% last month—the biggest monthly decline since January 2009, when the recession’s fury was still raging. There’s no way to sugarcoat this tumble, although it’s worth pointing out that most of the drop is due to the volatile transport industry. Durable goods orders ex-transport was still down last month, but by a considerably milder 1.6% fall.
Take note too that capital goods orders—a.k.a. business investment, or new durable goods orders less defense and aircraft—actually rose in August, climbing a moderate 1.2%. That's the first monthly gain since May. Hmmm....
But there’s no getting around the fact that the trend in new orders has turned negative. As the next chart shows, demand for durable goods is shrinking—for both the top line measure and for capital goods. That hasn’t happened in more than two years. It doesn’t help that today’s third revision of third-quarter real GDP fell to an annualized 1.3% rate, or down from the previous estimate of 1.7%. The slow recovery just got slower in broad terms, according to official numbers.
The critical question now: Will the weakness in durable goods orders spill over into the rest of the economy? Or is the drop in this series just short-term noise? It’s folly to dismiss the risk that today's numbers imply, but it’s also premature to conclude that the business cycle’s fate has been sealed. We’ll need to see more darkness in more data sets before issuing a call to man the cyclical lifeboats and evacuate the passengers. But the possibility of rough seas and worse looks somewhat more plausible—particularly if you ignore the jobless claims data, and quite a bit of the other numbers that collectively add up to the U.S. economy.
Nonetheless, we seem to be at another critical juncture. It's possible that we're being misled by the short-term noise. It wouldn't be the first time, and so it's important to maintain objectivity by looking at a broad cross section of the numbers. On that note, tomorrow we learn how personal income and spending fared in August. Once those numbers arrive, I'll update the Capital Spectator's Economic Trend Index and GDP nowcast for a fresh benchmark for evaluating how the outlook has changed. Stay tuned….
About the Author - James Picerno is a veteran financial journalist since the early 1990s at Bloomberg, Dow Jones, etc. before becoming an independent writer/analyst/consultant in 2008. James is also the author of Dynamic Asset Allocation (Bloomberg Financial, 2010) and he writes at The Capital Speculator. (EconMatters author archive here)
The views and opinions expressed herein are the author's own, and do not necessarily reflect those of EconMatters.
© EconMatters All Rights Reserved | Facebook | Twitter | Post Alert | Kindle